Limitations of Triage in Military Mass Casualty Response: A Case Series.

TitleLimitations of Triage in Military Mass Casualty Response: A Case Series.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2024
AuthorsRush SC, Lauria MJ, DeSoucy EScott, Koch EJ, Kamler JJ, Remley MA, Alway N, Brodie F, Foudrait A, Barendregt P, Atkins M, Miller K, Hines R, Champagne M, Paladino L, Shackelford SA, Miles EA, Obiajulu J, Dorlac WC, Gurney JM, Robb D, Kue RC
JournalJ Spec Oper Med
Volume24
Issue3
Pagination62-66
Date Published2024 Oct 02
ISSN1553-9768
KeywordsAlgorithms, Emergency Medical Services, Humans, Mass Casualty Incidents, Military Medicine, Military Personnel, Retrospective Studies, Triage
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mass casualty events (MASCALs) in the combat environment, which involve large numbers of casualties that overwhelm immediately available resources, are fundamentally chaotic and dynamic and inherently dangerous. Formal triage systems use diagnostic algorithms, colored markers, and four or more named categories. We hypothesized that formal triage systems are inadequately trained and practiced and too complex to successfully implement in true MASCAL events. This retrospective analysis evaluates the real-world application of triage systems in prehospital military MASCALs and other aspects of MASCAL management.

METHODS: We surveyed Special Operations Forces (SOF) medics known to us who have participated in military prehospital MASCALs and analyzed them. Aggregated data describing the scope of the incidents, the use of formal triage algorithms and colored markers, the number of categories, and the interventions on scene were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and lessons learned were consolidated.

RESULTS: From 1996 to 2022 we identified 29 MASCALs that were managed by military medics in the prehospital setting. There was a median of three providers (range 1-85) and 15 casualties (range 6-519) per event. Four or more formal triage categories were used in only one event. Colored markers and formal algorithms were not used. Life-saving interventions were performed in 27 of 29 (93%) missions and blood transfusions were performed in four (17%) MASCALs. The top lessons learned were: 1) security and accountability are cornerstones of MASCAL management; 2) casualty movement is a priority; 3) intuitive triage categories are the default; 4) life-saving interventions are performed as time and tactics permit.

CONCLUSION: Formal triage systems requiring the use ofdiagnostic algorithms, colored tags, and four or five categories are seldom implemented in real-world military prehospital MASCAL management. The training of field triage should be simplified and pragmatic, as exemplified by these instances.

DOI10.55460/0GO5-QW03
Alternate JournalJ Spec Oper Med
PubMed ID39172917

Mailing Address
New York-Presbyterian Hospital
Weill Cornell Medical Center
Department of Emergency Medicine
525 E. 68th St., Box 179
New York, NY 10065

Office of the Chair
Emergency Medicine
525 E. 68th St., M-130
New York, NY 10065
(212) 746-0780

Residency Offices
Physician Residency
530 E. 70th St., M-127

New York, NY 10021
May2004@med.cornell.edu
(212) 746-0892

Physician Assistant
empa_residency@med.cornell.edu

Nurse Practitioner
ldm4001@med.cornell.edu

Research Office
525 E. 68th St., M-130
New York, NY 10065
EMResearch@med.cornell.edu

Leading Emergency Care